Categories: Bitcoin Latest News

Nic Carter Is Wrong About the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve

When I saw Nic Carter’s recent Bloomberg interview, I couldn’t help but shake my head. Nic, who’s been a long-time Bitcoiner and someone I respect, said that the US shouldn’t—and won’t—buy Bitcoin for its strategic reserves because it would supposedly signal weakness in the dollar on the global stage. I get his argument, but I completely disagree. In fact, I think it’s the exact opposite.

In my view, adding Bitcoin to the US reserves would be a massive show of strength. It would send a message to the world that the US sees Bitcoin for what it is: a financial safeguard, a form of “digital gold,” and not some competitor to the dollar.

The US already holds tons of assets in its reserves—crude oil, diesel, uranium, foreign currencies, and over $500 billion in gold. None of those holdings makes the dollar look weak. Instead, they reinforce confidence in the dollar’s stability. Bitcoin would do the same.

Now, let’s talk about the risk of not buying Bitcoin. If the US refuses to include Bitcoin in its reserves, it sends a dangerous message: that the US is afraid of Bitcoin and views it as a threat rather than an ally. And here’s the kicker—if the US doesn’t act, another major country will.

Imagine what happens if China or Russia starts accumulating Bitcoin and positions it as an alternative to the dollar. That’s a terrifying thought for the US. But if the US buys Bitcoin, it changes the narrative entirely. It would integrate Bitcoin into the US financial system, showing the world that Bitcoin isn’t a threat—it’s part of the dollar’s ecosystem. Just like holding gold reserves doesn’t undermine the dollar, holding Bitcoin would only boost confidence in the US at the global level.

And let’s not forget Bitcoin has been the best-performing asset of the last decade. If you’re American, why wouldn’t you want the US to have the best asset in its reserves? It might even help pay down some of that $36 trillion debt someday.

So yeah, I think Nic Carter is wrong on this one. Adding Bitcoin to the US reserves wouldn’t signal weakness—it would scream confidence, strength, and forward-thinking leadership. If the US wants to stay ahead, it needs to act before someone else does.

This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Read More[#item_full_content]Bitcoin Magazine – Bitcoin News, Articles and Expert Insights

Recent Posts

Strive Bitcoin Holdings Reach 35,595 BTC As Wall Street Raises Price Target 27%

TL;DR: TD Cowen reportedly raised its Strive share-price target from $44 to $56 after the…

9 hours ago

Charles Schwab Opens Bitcoin And Ethereum Transfers As Crypto Rollout Expands

TL;DR: Charles Schwab is expanding its direct Bitcoin and Ethereum services, including phased external wallet…

13 hours ago

Deutsche Bank Nears Bitcoin Custody Launch As Crypto Push Expands Beyond Europe

TL;DR: Deutsche Bank is preparing to introduce institutional digital asset custody services, initially targeting professional…

18 hours ago

Bitcoin ETFs Lose $82 Million As BlackRock Leads Friday’s Withdrawals

TL;DR: US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately $82.4 million in net outflows on October 16.…

20 hours ago

MSCI Tightens Index Rules As Strategy And Other Bitcoin Treasury Firms Face Fresh Scrutiny

TL;DR: MSCI has revised its methodology for classifying non-operating companies, putting Bitcoin-heavy treasury businesses under…

23 hours ago

Satoshi-era bitcoin faces a bigger quantum threat after Google’s new Willow breakthrough

Google says its Willow chip can prepare the special quantum states needed for advanced calculations…

1 day ago