Democrats Should Reverse Their Stance On Bitcoin

Follow Frank on X.

Last month at the New York Times DealBook Summit, political analyst and media personality Van Jones admitted that the Democrats made a fatal mistake in not only largely disregarding the crypto voter but in acting against them during the last election cycle and more broadly during President Biden’s time in office.

“50 million people bought some crypto — that’s a bet on [the] future,” said Jones.

“They’re trying to get to a better future. Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren beating the hell out of crypto was not smart,” he added.

CNN host @VanJones68 says, “Democrats ran people out of the party on crypto. 50 million people bought crypto. It’s a bet on a better future” pic.twitter.com/Ee8NlutNK1

— Documenting ₿itcoin 📄 (@DocumentingBTC) January 6, 2025

Jones is one of the first prominent Democrats to publicly admit post election that the Democrats should have invited those who hold bitcoin and crypto into the party instead of pushing them away.

The questions now are Will other well-known Democrats follow Jones’s lead? and What would their policy proposals look like if they did?

The latter question is particularly important because while Democrats may begin to say they’re “pro-crypto,” the devil is in the details.

For example, when I interviewed former Congressman Wiley Nickel (D-NC), one of the few outspoken bitcoin and crypto proponents in the Democratic party last year, I asked him if he’d support the right for bitcoin and crypto owners to hold their private keys.

This was his response:

“In Congress, we’ve really focused on doing a few things before we get into the next level of stuff. It’s about regulating the industry, FIT21, the digital assets market structure bill and stablecoins. We’ve gotten sidetracked with SAB121 for custodial banking.

Those are the things that I think we need to tackle first, and then we get into the next layer of stuff, and I’m really hopeful we’re going to get those things done this Congress.”

The right to hold one’s private keys is the “first level of stuff” in my book, and his lack of a direct response to my question worried me, especially when juxtaposed with what Trump said on the matter at the Libertarian National Convention in May 2024:

“I will support the right to self-custody [for] the nation’s 50 million crypto holders.” -Donald J. Trump

So, if the Democrats are to start shifting their rhetoric when it comes to Bitcoin and crypto, they’re also going to need to come correct when it comes to policy proposals if they plan to win over the voters they lost in this previous election cycle come midterm elections.

This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Read More[#item_full_content]Bitcoin Magazine – Bitcoin News, Articles and Expert Insights